{"id":317483,"date":"2026-07-15T08:55:07","date_gmt":"2026-07-15T08:55:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/?p=317483"},"modified":"2026-07-15T09:02:20","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T09:02:20","slug":"person-behind-ai-model-crucial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/interview\/person-behind-ai-model-crucial\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the person behind the AI model remains crucial"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

AI and machine learning have long been part of everyday practice in asset management. However, the more readily available algorithms become, the more important it is to consider who understands them, uses them correctly and scrutinises them critically. Carsten Rother, Co-Head of Research Forecasts, and Dr Desislava Rakova, Research Forecasts \u2013 who recently undertook further training as part of a machine learning programme at Stanford University \u2013 discuss why further training, an understanding of models and human judgement remain crucial \u2013 and how Quoniam deploys AI where it can create genuine added value.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Why is continuing professional development in AI and machine learning so important for research teams today?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Desislava: <\/strong>A sound academic education forms the foundation. But in a field that is developing as rapidly as artificial intelligence, it is not enough to acquire knowledge once and then assume that it will suffice in the long term. Many methods, tools and applications are constantly changing \u2013 and some have already found their way into practice before they are fully integrated into university curricula.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, it has become very easy to apply algorithms these days. There are software packages, cloud infrastructure and AI assistants that quickly generate suggestions. You can feed data into a model and get a result very quickly. But that is precisely where the risk lies: just because a model is running doesn\u2019t mean you understand whether it is suitable for your specific research question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My further training therefore focused primarily on gaining a deeper understanding of what goes on behind the scenes in these models: How are algorithms parameterised? Why does a model sometimes fail to converge? Which settings are appropriate for which problem? And when does a result merely look good, but is in fact not robust?<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

Quantitative asset management is comparable to Formula 1: Having a good car is not enough; you have to understand and optimise every single component.<\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n
\n

Carsten Rother,
\nCo-Head of Research Forecasts<\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Carsten, why is this deeper understanding so important for Quoniam?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carsten:<\/strong> Because quantitative asset management is very much about the finer details. I like to compare it to Formula 1. It\u2019s not enough just to have a good car. You have to understand and optimise every single component: the data, the models, the parameterisation, the validation, the implementation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Running algorithms is becoming easier and easier. The added value comes from knowing which algorithm to use and when, what its characteristics are, and why it works \u2013 or doesn\u2019t work \u2013 in a particular case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then machine learning is no longer a black box. To someone who only sees the output, it may seem that way. But if you understand the mechanics, the parameters and the limitations, it ceases to be guesswork and becomes a conscious research process.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Where does this manifest itself specifically in the investment process?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Desislava:<\/strong> Algorithms can play a role at various stages. They can be incorporated into forecasting models, generate signals or help assess risks more accurately. One example from the fixed-income sector is downgrade models. These aren\u2019t about directly forecasting returns, but rather about determining whether a company\u2019s credit profile might deteriorate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A vivid example from the course was the so-called \u2018cocktail party problem\u2019. You have a recording with many voices and background noise, and an algorithm is supposed to isolate the voice of the actual speaker. At first glance, this has nothing to do with asset management, but the analogy is very clear: we, too, try to filter out the relevant signal from the noise of the markets.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

What do you need to understand before selecting a model?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Desislava:<\/strong> It always starts with defining the problem. What am I actually trying to solve? Is it about forecasting returns, assessing risk, classification, or gaining a better understanding of a market mechanism? That determines which model makes sense in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you skip this step, you can very quickly waste a lot of time. A model may run technically but still fail to deliver meaningful output. In that case, however, the problem may not lie with the algorithm, but rather with the fact that the question was unclear or the parameterisation was incorrect.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

You talk a lot about parameterisation and fine-tuning. Why are these adjustments so crucial?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carsten:<\/strong> Because that\u2019s often where the real difference lies. The big idea is important, but it\u2019s not enough. What matters is how the model is configured, which data is used, which training and validation periods are chosen, and how the results are interpreted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This doesn\u2019t just apply to machine learning. Even with traditional factors such as value or momentum, the details make a huge difference. How do I define value? How do I measure momentum? How do I deal with outliers? How do I test whether an effect is stable? This detailed work is an essential part of proprietary research.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

What does robustness mean in this context?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carsten:<\/strong> Robust means that a model must not just look good on historical data. It must also be able to function in future situations it has not yet encountered. This is particularly important in asset management, because no two crises are the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take downgrades, for example. A downgrade can have many causes: debt, rising interest rates, a changed business model or other factors. There isn\u2019t one perfect threshold that applies to every company. That\u2019s why we aren\u2019t looking for a model that explains the past as well as possible but is too specialised. We\u2019re looking for robust solutions that remain resilient even in different market environments.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Has the course changed your day-to-day work?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Desislava:<\/strong> Yes. I\u2019ve become more confident when I need to structure a problem and find a solution. At the same time, I\u2019ve become more critical \u2013 even towards my own projects or those of my colleagues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nowadays, I ask more frequently: Why was this particular model chosen? Why these parameters? Why this training period? Why this validation? These are simple questions, but they are crucial. Data preparation is important, but model selection and parameterisation are just as important.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

When it comes to challenging research questions, you need to know very precisely what you are actually expecting, which data are relevant and how a result should be interpreted.<\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n
\n

Dr Desislava Rakova,
\nResearch Forecasts<\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

What role does AI play in day-to-day research?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Desislava: <\/strong>I definitely see AI as a tool. For repetitive or very well-structured tasks, it\u2019s already delivering significant efficiency gains. It can help us work faster, prepare code, structure ideas or identify initial solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But when it comes to more challenging research questions, a plausible-sounding answer is not enough. You need to know very precisely what you\u2019re actually expecting, which data is relevant and how a result should be interpreted. If this groundwork is missing, AI can even lead to a lot of time being wasted \u2013 or to relying on a solution that only appears convincing on the surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In asset management in particular, the aim is not simply to obtain averagely good answers. We need to develop robust, transparent and investable solutions. Human judgement remains crucial for this.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Carsten, what does this mean for the research team?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carsten:<\/strong> This culture of critical thinking is central to what we do. We want people who question academic research, our own models and even AI-generated suggestions. That is precisely why we support training programmes such as this course. They benefit not just one person, but the whole team.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quantitative asset management combines capital market expertise, mathematical understanding and technical implementation. AI can make us more efficient. But when it comes to the crucial details, we still need experienced researchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This also aligns with our fundamental understanding of AI: we want to use it where it makes sense and creates real added value. But it must be embedded within a controlled, transparent investment process.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

What is the key message?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Desislava:<\/strong> A sound academic background is the foundation. But in a field that is developing so rapidly, you have to keep learning. You need to understand what\u2019s going on behind the algorithms and mustn\u2019t rely on a tool to automatically deliver the right solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carsten: <\/strong>Exactly. Applying algorithms is becoming easier and easier. The key is to understand why they work \u2013 and when they don\u2019t.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

AI can make research faster and more efficient. However, the decisive added value arises when people understand models, recognise their limitations and critically interpret the results. For Quoniam, human expertise therefore remains a central component of a robust and transparent investment process.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN<\/h6>\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n <\/a> \n
\n \n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Interview\n \n <\/div>\n
\n May 2026\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
AI in systematic equities: Why discipline matters more than speed<\/div>\n
\n

Artificial intelligence is already part of the research toolkit in systematic investing. For professional investors, however, the relevant question is not simply whether a manager uses AI. It is whether AI is integrated into a disciplined process, tested rigorously, and governed with clear accountability.<\/p>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n <\/a> \n
\n \n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Interview\n \n <\/div>\n
\n February 2026\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Machine learning in stock selection: Beyond linear thinking<\/div>\n
\n

Stock markets are complex, and correlations are not always linear. Nevertheless, traditional models often rely on linear assumptions. So how can this gap be closed? In this interview, Carsten Rother, Co-Head of Research Forecasts, explains how Quoniam has been using machine learning to enhance traditional models.<\/p>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n <\/a> \n
\n \n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Interview\n \n <\/div>\n
\n February 2026\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Corporate bond portfolios: Are you seeing alpha \u2014 or just taking more risk?<\/div>\n
\n

Comparing fixed income performance is more complicated than it appears. Differences in duration, spread or credit risk can dominate returns, making it difficult to tell whether apparent outperformance reflects genuine security selection or simply higher risk exposure.<\/p>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n <\/a> \n
\n \n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Interview\n \n <\/div>\n
\n December 2025\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
New research sheds light on the link between inflation and uncertainty<\/div>\n
\n

What truly drives long-term inflation uncertainty? New research shows that it is not short-term shocks, but macro-financial factors such as political uncertainty, market volatility and yield spreads that shape the picture. In the interview, Quoniam researcher Dr Tamas Barko explains why stable communication is crucial \u2014 and which long-standing economic assumptions are now being put to the test.<\/p>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n <\/a> \n
\n \n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Interview\n \n <\/div>\n
\n October 2025\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Cracking the momentum puzzle: Fresh research on stock-specific signals<\/div>\n
\n

The article ‘The Many Facets of Stock Momentum: Distinguishing Factor and Stock Components’ by Quoniam Research analysts Dr Xavier G\u00e9rard, CFA and Dr Laura Jehl was accepted for publication in the Financial Analysts Journal and is now available on the Journal\u2019s website. The authors examine the ongoing debate on whether stock momentum is driven purely by factor exposures or if there is a genuine stock-specific component. The paper offers new evidence that adds depth to one of the most widely discussed anomalies in finance.<\/p>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n <\/a> \n
\n \n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Article\n \n <\/div>\n
\n September 2025\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Enhanced corporate bonds: Where algorithms meet capital market expertise<\/div>\n
\n

Enhanced strategies provide investors with an efficient way to target outperformance without deviating significantly from benchmark risk. Quoniam offers an ideal combination of science-based models, powerful technical infrastructure and capital market expertise. This enables investors to invest close to the benchmark while aiming for controlled outperformance.<\/p>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

AI and machine learning have long been part of everyday practice in asset management. However, the more readily available algorithms become, the more important it is to consider who understands them, uses them correctly and scrutinises them critically. Carsten Rother, Co-Head of Research Forecasts, and Dr Desislava Rakova, Research Forecasts \u2013 who recently undertook further […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":317463,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Why the person behind the AI model remains crucial","_seopress_titles_desc":"Carsten Rother and Dr Desislava Rakova explain why AI can provide valuable support in research \u2013 and why human judgement remains indispensable.","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[92],"tags":[118,105,86],"class_list":["post-317483","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-interview","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-machine-learning","tag-research"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317483","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317483"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317483\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":318802,"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317483\/revisions\/318802"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317463"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317483"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317483"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quoniam.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317483"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}